Legal Opinion

McEneaney v. Chestnut Hill Realty Corp.

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided May 17, 1995No. 94-P-208PublishedCited by 65 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPorada, J.

On August 21, 1987, the plaintiff purchased a condominium at the Brook House in Brookline. At the time of the purchase he inquired of the real estate agent, the defendant Brenda Marsh, whether the condominium was quiet and was assured by her that “the unit was quiet and that there [were] no noise problems with the unit.” In June, 1990, the plaintiff began to experience noise and vibrations in his condominium after an air conditioning chiller system which was in place in a common area of his building but was inoperative at the time of purchase was activated. When the noise level and vibrations…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Nader v. CitronMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  2. Zimmerman v. KentMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1991
  3. Doe v. New Bedford Housing AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
  4. Noble v. MurphyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1993
  5. Briggs v. Carol Cars, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. Rodi v. Southern New England School of LawCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
  2. G. v. The Fay SchoolCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2019
  3. Cummings v. HPG International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
  4. Office One, Inc. v. LopezMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
  5. Berish v. BornsteinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API