Conrad v. Auto Club Insurance Ass'n
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam:.
Defendant appeals as of right from the trial court’s grant of summary disposition to plaintiffs and the denial of defendant’s motion for similar relief. Defendant asserts that the trial court erred in concluding that defendant could not deduct plaintiff Evelyn Conrad’s workers’ compensation benefits from the personal protection insurance benefits defendant was otherwise obligated to pay plaintiff under an insurance contract. We agree and reverse.
Plaintiffs purchased a no-fault automobile liability policy from defendant that specifically provided for noncoordinated personal…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Rizzo v. KretschmerMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
- Raska v. Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
- O'Donnell v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
- LeBlanc v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
- Sibley v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Supreme Court · 1988
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.