Legal Opinion

Ring v. Kruse

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 22, 1954No. 33371PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChappell, J.

Elmer W. Ring brought this action to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been proximately caused by the negligence of defendant Richard J. Kruse, his agents and employees. His agents and employees were Paul Johnson, foreman of defendant’s livestock and feeding operations in Thurston County, who had general charge of employing, supervising, and discharging help on defendant’s farm and who employed plaintiff on February 3, 1949, to help them “a few days,” and Fred Drapeau, a farm hand, who plaintiff alleged was a superior employee or servant, authorized to give orders and…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Sioux City & Pacific Railroad v. FinlaysonNebraska Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Davis v. SpindlerNebraska Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. KelloggNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Westover v. HooverNebraska Supreme Court · 1911
  5. McDonald v. Omaha & Council Bluffs Street Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1934

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Barnette v. DoyleWyoming Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Knoell v. HuffNebraska Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Anderson v. EvansNebraska Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Mellor v. Ten Sleep Cattle CompanyWyoming Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Widga v. SandellNebraska Supreme Court · 1991

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API