Hoop v. United States
District Court, E.D. North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MALCOLM J. HOWARD, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on the United States’ motion for summary judgment. Plaintiffs and third party defendant have responded to the United States’ motion; therefore, this matter is ripe for ruling.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
These actions were filed separately but consolidated with the consent of the parties. Plaintiffs brought these actions pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2671, et seq. (“FTCA”). In Fesmire v. United States, 4:98-CV-108-H(3), the United States filed an answer and third party complaint against Patricia Hoop,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Ross v. Communications Satellite Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
- Greensboro Professional Fire Fighters Ass'n, Local 3157 Steven B. Zimmerman v. City of GreensboroCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Estate of Purkey Ex Rel. Purkey v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2004
- Estate of Ledford Ex Rel. Jarnigan v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2004