Pratt v. Van Rensselaer
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFellows, J.
Plaintiff brought this suit to recover upon a contract under which he did the carpenter work on defendant’s house and for extras. The contract price was $8,092.60, the claim for extras amounted to $2,305.31. He had been paid by defendant on order of her architect $9,510, and claimed with interest a balance due of $887.91. Defendant did not give notice of recoupment but insisted plaintiff had not properly performed the terms of the contract in several particulars and was not entitled to recover the balance due on the contract price. It does not seem to be seriously contended that the extras…
2Cited by7 opinions
- In Re American Casualty Company, American Casualty Company, (86-1728), (87-1125) v. City of Detroit, (86-1728), (87-1125), Brady Mechanical, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
- Heidtman Steel Products, Inc. v. Compuware Corp.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2001
- Heidtman Steel Products, Inc. v. Compuware Corp.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2001
- Insurance Co. of North America v. CuevasMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
- Karoumi v. Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2019
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.