Legal Opinion

Heidtman Steel Products, Inc. v. Compuware Corp.

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided August 13, 2001No. 3:97CV7389PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

CARR, District Judge

This case involves a dispute over the installation of a computer system by defendant Compuware Corporation (“Compu-ware”) for plaintiff Heidtman Steel Products, Inc. (“Heidtman”). This Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1367. Pending is Compuware’s motion for summary judgment on Heidtman’s rescission and fraud claims. (Doc. 168). For the following reasons, Compuware’s motion for summary judgment is denied in part and granted in part.

BACKGROUND

Heidtman is a Toledo-based company in the business of purchasing flat rolled steel coils for processing…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Huron Tool and Engineering Co. v. Precision Consulting Services, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Neibarger v. Universal Coopertives, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1992

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Convergent Group Corp. v. County of KentDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2003
  2. Vt. Gas Sys. v. Riser Mgmt. Sys.Vermont Superior Court · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API