Legal Opinion

Nordlund v. Eubank

District Court, D. Alaska

Decided December 21, 2021No. 3:20-cv-00085Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ALASKA DAVID C. NORDLUND, Plaintiff, Case No. 3:20-cv-00085-JMK vs. ORDER GRANTING DOMINICK EUBANK, et al., DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Defendants. Before the Court at Docket 38 is Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff, representing himself, responded at Docket 41 with “Plaintiff’s Opposition to Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgement [and] Counter Motion for Summary Judgement.”1 Defendants replied at Docket 44. For the reasons stated below, Defendants’ Motion is GRANTED. 1 Cross-motions for summary judgment…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Baker v. McCollanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Jonathon Castro v. County of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API