Reiner v. Reiner

*269 The present appeal stems from a dispute over the interpretation of a settlement agreement *270 between, among others, the plaintiff Michael D. Reiner 1 and the defendant Jeffrey A. Reiner. 2 The defendant appeals from the judgment of the trial court, rendered after a hearing pursuant to Audubon Parking Associates Ltd. Partnership v. Barclay & Stubbs, Inc. , 225 Conn. 804 , 811-12, 626 A.2d 729 (1993) ( Audubon ), 3 denying his motion to enforce the agreement. On appeal, the defendant claims that the court improperly concluded that the settlement agreement is clear and unambiguous, as construed…