Motorola, Inc. v. Togo D. West, Secretary of the Army
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
RADER, Circuit Judge.
Aydin Corporation, proceeding through Motorola, Inc., the prime contractor, appeals a decision of the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals (Board) partially denying Aydin Corporation’s appeal from a contracting officer’s final decision. Because no statute of limitations bars the Government’s claim and Aydin Corporation did not meet its submission requirements under the Truth in Negotiations Act (TINA), this court affirms.
I
Aydin Corporation brings this appeal in the name and with the authorization of Motorola, Inc. (Motorola), the prime contractor. On August 10,1984,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- S.E.R., Jobs for Progress, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Interstate General Government Contractors, Inc. v. Michael P.W. Stone, Secretary of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- Cutler-Hammer, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969
- Edward R. Madigan, Secretary of Agriculture v. Hobin Lumber CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Lockheed Aircraft Corporation, Lockheed-Georgia Company Division v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
3Cited by13 opinions
- Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- Aero Union Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
- City of Burbank, California v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
- Sucesion J. Serralles, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
- Axion Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.