Legal Opinion
Hellman v. Hoenig & Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 24, 1997PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract and fraud, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (DiBlasi, J.), entered September 11, 1996, as granted the corporate defendants’ motion for summary judgment which was to dismiss the third, fourth, fifth, and sixth causes of action insofar as asserted against them.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
The Supreme Court properly held that the third cause of action of the amended complaint did not relate back to the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft v. SpinaleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Rattner v. YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Green Bus Lines, Inc. v. General Motors Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Rende v. CutrofelloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Perez v. Wegman CompaniesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
3Cited by3 opinions
- Gelmac Quality Feeds, Inc. v. RonningAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Boccone v. Island Federal Mortgage Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Angel v. StrulovichAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2025