Legal Opinion

Perez v. Wegman Companies

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 13, 1992PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— Order reversed on the law without costs, motion granted and amended complaint dismissed. Memorandum: The court erred in denying defendant’s motion to dismiss, on timeliness grounds, plaintiff’s amended complaint asserting a Labor Law § 740 cause of action. The action is time-barred by the one-year Statute of Limitations of Labor Law § 740 (4) (a). Even assuming that the timeliness of the cause of action in the amended complaint can be determined in terms of the dismissed causes of action in the original complaint, the "relation back” theory of CPLR 203 (e) does not apply. The retaliatory…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Smith v. BessenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  2. O'Connor v. WestAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Brown v. Vail-Ballou Press, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  2. Hellman v. Hoenig & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  3. David B. Nelson, M.D., P.C. v. StrohAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API