Legal Opinion

United Electrical Contractors Association v. Ordman

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided May 28, 1965No. 64 Civ. 3565PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CANNELLA, District Judge.

Motion by the defendants, pursuant to Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, for an order dismissing the complaint on the grounds that this court lacks jurisdiction over the subject matter of the action and that the complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, is granted. In view of the court’s determination, the defendant’s motion in the alternative for summary judgment pursuant to Rules 12 and 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the plaintiffs’ cross-motion for summary judgment are not discussed.

At various times between…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Skelly Oil Co. v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Leedom v. KyneSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Schilling v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. Amalgamated Utility Workers v. Consolidated Edison Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  5. MacAuley v. Waterman Steamship Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Trailways of New England, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Transcontinental Bus System, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics BoardCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1969
  2. Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co. v. Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
  3. Genoveva R. Sosa v. David FiteCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
  4. Board Of Trustees Of The Memorial Hospital Of Fremont County, Wyoming v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1975
  5. McInnis v. WeinbergerDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1975

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API