Legal Opinion

McInnis v. Weinberger

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided January 10, 1975No. Civ. A. 74-1481-TPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TAURO, District Judge.

Dorothy Mclnnis, Richard Cardeiro and Blanche Davis are residents of Massachusetts who are currently receiving benefits under the new federal Supplemental Security Income Program (S.S. I.) 1 42 U.S.C. § 1381 et seq. They bring this action on behalf of themselves and all Massachusetts S.S.I. recipients challenging a decision by the Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare that they are no longer eligible to receive food stamps under the Food Stamps and Commodity Distribution Program. 7 U.S.C. § 2011; 7 U.S.C. § 1431 et seq. 2

Jurisdiction is based on 28 U.S.C. §…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hein v. BurnsDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1975
  2. Dorothy McInnis v. Caspar W. WeinbergerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1976
  3. Ashley v. ButzDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API