Legal Opinion

In Re the Proceedings for the Disbarment of Liliopoulos

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 8, 1933No. C.D. 1590. En BancPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Main, J.—

This is a disbarment proceeding.

G. D. Liliopoulos was admitted to the bar in this state June 17,1913. April 7,1931, he was found guilty by the verdict of a jury of the crime of grand larceny, and was sentenced to the state penitentiary “for the term of not less than one (1) year and not more than fifteen years. Sentence to be suspended pending the further order of the court.” Prom the judgment and sentence, he appealed (State v. Liliopoulos, 165 Wash. 197, 5 P. (2d) 319), and the judgment was affirmed.

Rem. Rev. Stat., § 139-14, provides that an attorney may be disbarred or suspended

“.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1833
  2. In Re RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  3. Fuller v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
  4. Arthur v. CraigSupreme Court of Iowa · 1878
  5. In re Conditional Discharge of ConvictsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1901

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Du Vall v. Board of Medical ExaminersArizona Supreme Court · 1937
  2. In Re the Proceedings for the Disbarment of BarnettWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  3. In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against EggerWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  4. In Re the Disbarment of BurnsWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  5. In Re LillionsWashington Supreme Court · 1938

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API