Legal Opinion

Smith Barney, Inc. v. Vivian Hause

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 1, 1997PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Jane Solomon, J.), entered June 28, 1995, which granted petitioner’s application to stay arbitration, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the application denied.

This proceeding arises out of certain investments made by respondents in 1986 and 1987. According to respondents, an employee of petitioner recommended that respondents invest a substantial portion of their assets in a single, highly speculative, limited partnership. After suffering considerable losses, respondents sought to arbitrate claims of unsuitability and *105misrepresentat…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Mastrobuono v. Shearson Lehman Hutton, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Smith Barney Shearson Inc. v. SacharowNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. Levine v. Advest, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  3. Port Authority v. Office of Contract ArbitratorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  4. Kidder, Peabody & Co. v. FischAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  5. Hackel v. AbramowitzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API