Legal Opinion

Roe v. Cherry-Burrell Corporation

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided November 27, 1970No. Docket 6,755PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLevin, P. J.

This is a product liability case. The plaintiff, Joseph B. Roe, suffered personal injuries that he claims were caused by a defect in a device manufactured by the defendant, Cherry-Burrell Corporation. The trial judge ruled that the defendant could not take discovery depositions of plaintiff’s expert witnesses. The defendant appeals on leave granted. We reverse.

The complaint alleges that the plaintiff, while in the course of his employment and while inspecting and examining a super-plate heat exchanger in operation, suffered widespread first, second, and third-degree steam burns when a clamp…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Lindsay v. LipsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Guastello v. Citizens Mutual InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
  4. Klabunde v. StanleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Wilson v. Saginaw Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1963

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Great Lakes Div. v. City of EcorseMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. Great Lakes Division of National Steel Corp. v. City of EcorseMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. Daniels v. Allen Industries, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Kissel v. Nelson Packing Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. Evans v. HussIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API