Legal Opinion
Wilson v. Saginaw Circuit Judge
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided June 6, 1963No. Docket 49,559; Calendar 19, Docket 49,687PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSouris, J.
These cases 1 require our determination whether statements and reports of witnesses and parties procured by an insured party’s insurance carrier were subject to discovery under the provisions of our former Court Rule No 35, § 6 (a) (1945). Since January 1, 1963, discovery such as was sought and ordered in these cases has been subject to the provisions of our new court rules, specifically GrCR 1963, 302.2, 306.2, and 310.
It is quite apparent that the controversies presented to us in these cases arose as a result of our recent decision in Kalamazoo Yellow Cab Company v. Kalamazoo Circuit Judge,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Christie v. BD. OF REGENTS UNIVERSITY REGENTSMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
- Tomlinson v. TomlinsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1953
- Kalamazoo Yellow Cab Co. v. Kalamazoo Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
- Berney v. VolkMichigan Supreme Court · 1955
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Peisner v. Detroit Free Press, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1976
- J. A. Utley Co. v. Saginaw Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1964
- Powers v. City of TroyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
- Snyder v. New York Central Transport Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1966
- Peasley v. Lapeer Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1964
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.