Legal Opinion

Garnett v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 23, 1984No. 83-961PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

457 So.2d 1144 (1984)

Errol GARNETT, Appellant,

v.

The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 83-961.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

October 23, 1984.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Elliot H. Scherker, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Renee E. Ruska, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and HUBBART and FERGUSON, JJ.

SCHWARTZ, Chief Judge.

We reject the defendant's claim that he was entitled to discharge under the speedy trial rule, Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.191. Garnett did not appear on the date scheduled for trial. Although his absence…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Sherrod v. FranzaSupreme Court of Florida · 1983
  2. Holmes v. LefflerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  3. Robbins v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  4. Harris v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  5. Singleton v. GrossDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. RasulDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  2. Walker v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  3. Jones v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  4. Pilgrim v. SwansonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  5. Mainwaring v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API