Legal Opinion
State v. Rasul
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided May 15, 1985No. 84-1055PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
468 So.2d 1088 (1985)
STATE of Florida, Appellant,
v.
Natal RASUL, Appellee.
No. 84-1055.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
May 15, 1985.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Charles Corces, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellant.
James Marion Moorman, Public Defender; and Douglas P. Chanco, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellee.
FRANK, Judge.
The state appeals the trial court's application of the speedy trial principle. We must consider whether the appellee was continuously available for trial in order to determine whether the trial court's discharge of him was proper…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Richardson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976
- Ramos v. AmidonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972
- Singleton v. GrossDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
- Garnett v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
3Cited by10 opinions
- Tirado v. ReeseDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
- Perry v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
- Jones v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
- Pilgrim v. SwansonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
- Barron v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.