Legal Opinion
Mainwaring v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided May 15, 2009No. 5D08-3080PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtMonaco, J.
The petitioner, Randy Mainwaring, seeks entry of a writ' of prohibition, the intention of which is to secure a discharge of certain criminal charges against him because of a failure of the State to accord him a speedy trial. Upon consideration of his petition and the response of the State, we remanded this case to the trial court for an evidentiary hearing on the issues surrounding Mr. Mainwaring’s motion for discharge. See Mainwaring v. State, 993 So.2d 1144 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008). At the conclusion of the hearing the trial court held that the motion for discharge was “not valid,” because “his…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Robbins v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
- Trainer v. BroomeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
- State v. RasulDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
- Tirado v. ReeseDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
- Walker v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Mainwaring v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009