Legal Opinion
Daisy Mountain Fire District v. Microsoft Corp.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided April 16, 2008No. Civil JFM 07-2851PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
J. FREDERICK MOTZ, District Judge.
Plaintiff Daisy Mountain Fire District (“Daisy”), a political subdivision of the State of Arizona, has brought suit against Microsoft Corporation (“Microsoft”) under the Arizona Antitrust Act, Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) § 44-1401 et seq. (Am. Comply 1.) Specifically, Daisy alleges that Microsoft has unlawfully maintained monopoly power in the operating system, word processing applications, and spreadsheet applications markets in violation of A.R.S. § 44-1403, 1 resulting in artificially inflated prices for its products in these three markets…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- American Pipe & Construction Co. v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Phillips Petroleum Co. v. ShuttsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Crown, Cork & Seal Co. v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re Microsoft Corp. Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2010
- Albert v. BMW of North America, LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2022
- Simon and Simon, PC v. Align Technology, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2020
- Simon and Simon, PC v. Align Technology, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2019