Legal Opinion

Rodríguez v. Saldaña

Supreme Court of Puerto Rico

Decided June 20, 1928No. 9Published

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hutchison

The third and fourth paragraphs of the third attempt on the part of petitioners to show why this court should entertain the proposed proceeding for an injunction read as follows:

“III. That by motion of the 23rd instant setting up an additional ground, which they considered and now consider sufficient, the petitioners renewed their prayer that this court take cognizance of their petition, inasmuch as for a similar reason this Supreme Court has taken original jurisdiction of numerous cited eases similar to this case.
“IV. That on the 24th instant this Supreme Court impliedly admitted the reasons…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Attorney General v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1874
  2. State ex rel. Attorney General v. CunningamWisconsin Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Attorney General v. City of Eau ClaireWisconsin Supreme Court · 1875
  4. State ex rel. Hartung v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Rodríguez v. SaldañaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API