People v. Forrester
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtConrey, P. J.
Pursuant to count two of an information duly filed, defendant was convicted of the crime of violation of chapter 339, Laws of 1923 (Act 1970 of Deering’s Gen. Laws 1923), “committed as follows: That the said John Forrester, on or about the twenty-ninth day of January, 1931, at and in the county of Los Angeles, state of California, did wilfully, unlawfully and feloniously have in his possession and custody and under his control a certain firearm, capable of being concealed upon the person, the said firearm having a barrel less than twelve inches in length, the said John Forrester having…
2Cited by14 opinions
- People v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- People v. BouzasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- People v. IsraelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- People v. D'A PhilippoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- People v. GarrowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.