Citizens for Responsibility & Ethics in Washington v. U.S. Department of Justice
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Amit P. Mehta, United States District Judge
I. INTRODUCTION
Section 552(a)(2) of the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”) is known as FOIA’s “reading room” requirement. Unlike its better-known counterpart, Section 552(a)(3), which provides that an agency’s disclosure obligation is triggered only upon a request for specific records, Section 552(a)(2) obligates agencies to make certain types of materials available “for public inspection and copying,” without the predicate requirement of a request. As pertinent here, subsections 552(a)(2)(A) and (a)(2)(B) require agencies to make…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Charles Kowal v. MCI Communications CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
- Bowen v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Citizens for Responsibility & Ethics in Washington v. United States Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
- Campaign for Accountability v. U.S. Department of JusticeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Prisology, Inc. v. Federal Bureau of PrisonsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
- Citizens for Responsibility & Ethics in Wash. v. U.S. Dep't of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Campaign for Accountability v. DOJCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2025
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.