Citizens for Responsibility & Ethics in Washington v. United States Department of Justice
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
TATEL, Circuit Judge:
Section 704 of the Administrative Procedure Act limits judicial review under that statute to agency actions “for which there is no other adequate remedy in a court.” 5 U.S.C. § 704. Appellant filed suit under the APA to compel the Department of Justice’s Office of Legal Counsel to meet its disclosure obligations under the “reading-room” provision of the Freedom of Information Act. 5 U.S.C. § 552(a)(2). The district court dismissed the case, concluding that appellant has an adequate remedy under FOIA. For the reasons set forth below, we agree and affirm.
I
“For decades, [the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Bowen v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Kissinger v. Reporters Committee for Freedom of the PressSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Porter v. Warner Holding Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Morley v. Central Intelligence AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by125 opinions
- Aracely v. NielsenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Judicial Watch, Inc. v. U.S. Dep't of Homeland SEC.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Elec. Privacy Info. Ctr. v. Internal Revenue Serv.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Am. Civil Liberties Union v. Nat'l Sec. AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
- Gulf Coast Maritime Supply, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
120 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.