Legal Opinion
Howard Young v. Christian Pfeiffer
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 12, 2019No. 19-70286PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT HOWARD ALLEN YOUNG, No. 19-70286 Applicant, v. OPINION CHRISTIAN PFEIFFER, Warden, Respondent. Application to File Second or Successive Petition Under
28 U.S.C. § 2254
Submitted July 2, 2019 * San Francisco, California Filed August 12, 2019 Before: M. Margaret McKeown, Jay S. Bybee, and John B. Owens, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam Opinion * The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 2 YOUNG V. PFEIFFER SUMMARY ** Habeas Corpus Denying an application for…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Schriro v. SummerlinSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Tyler v. CainSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Whorton v. BocktingSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Ezell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Karen Chades v. Molly HillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Taryn Christian v. Todd ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- James Lewis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- Harrell v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2020