Legal Opinion

The Natal

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 2, 1926No. 4800PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

14 F.2d 382 (1926)

THE NATAL.[*]

DAMPSKIBS AKTIESELSK ORIENT

v.

W. R. GRACE & CO.

No. 4800.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

August 2, 1926.

Nathan H. Frank and Irving H. Frank, both of San Francisco, Cal., and Duncan & Mount, of New York City, for appellant.

Goodfellow, Eells, Moore & Orrick, Hugh Goodfellow, and George Herrington, all of San Francisco, Cal., for appellee.

Before GILBERT, HUNT, and RUDKIN, Circuit Judges.

GILBERT, Circuit Judge.

From a consignment of 1,779 bundles of iron bars weighing 276,528 kilos, shipped by the appellee from New York to Buenos Aires, Argentina, by the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Queen of the PacificSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  2. The PersianaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1911
  3. Anchor Line (Henderson Bros.), Ltd. v. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925
  4. The WestminsterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1904
  5. The St. HubertCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1901

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hopper Paper Co. v. Baltimore & O.R. CoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1949
  2. Johnson v. Griffiths S. S. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1945
  3. Matson Nav. Co. v. Pope & Talbot, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1945
  4. Broughton & Wiggins Nav. Co. v. Hammond Lumber Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
  5. O. F. Nelson & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1945

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API