Legal Opinion

Taylor v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided November 30, 1977No. 10963PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KERN, Associate Judge:

A jury found appellant guilty of assault with intent to kill while armed (D.C.Code 1973, §§ 22-501, -3202), assault with intent to commit robbery while armed (D.C.Code 1973, §§ 22-501, -3202), and two counts of assault with a dangerous weapon (D.C.Code 1973, § 22-502). 1 On appeal, he argues that the trial court erred (a) in denying his motion to suppress a written incriminatory statement taken following the arrest, and (b) in declining to give a defense-requested instruction to the jury on “defense of another.” We disagree and affirm the convictions.

I

This case arose…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Michigan v. MosleySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Lego v. TwomeySupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Stevenson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  5. Paul Belton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Laumer v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. People v. FishSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
  3. State v. WengerOhio Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Catlett v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. United States v. AlexanderDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API