Legal Opinion
Molloy v. Fraser
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 22, 2010PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, in effect, to review so much of a determination of the Town of Carmel Zoning Board of Appeals dated February 23, 2009, as, after a hearing, granted that branch of the application of the respondent Putnam Arts Council which was for a use variance, the petitioners appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Putnam County (O’Rourke, J.), dated May 8, 2009, as denied the petition and, in effect, dismissed the proceeding.
Ordered that the appeal is dismissed as academic, with one bill of costs to the respondents…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Dreikausen v. Zoning Board of AppealsNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
- Citineighbors Coalition of Historic Carnegie Hill v. New York City Landmarks Preservation CommissionNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
- Gorman v. Town Board of Town of East HamptonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Dowd v. Planning BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Group for the South Fork, Inc. v. Planning BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Matter of Bruenn v. Town Bd. of Town of KentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- Matter of Town of Mt. Pleasant v. DelaneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017