Legal Opinion
Citineighbors Coalition of Historic Carnegie Hill v. New York City Landmarks Preservation Commission
New York Court of Appeals
Decided March 25, 2004PublishedCited by 74 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The appeal should be dismissed, with costs, as moot.
On June 10, 2002, the New York City Landmarks Preservation Commission issued a certificate of appropriateness (COA) approving a proposal for 47 East 91st Street, LLC, the property owner, and Tamarkin Co., a real estate developer, to construct an eight-story building with a one-story penthouse atop an existing one-story building located on the northeast corner of Madison Avenue and East 91st Street, which is within the Carnegie Hill Historic District. The Commission issued the COA after a 2V2-year review as a…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Dreikausen v. Zoning Board of AppealsNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
- Matter of Gold-Greenberger v. Human Res. Admin. of the City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
3Cited by74 opinions
- Wilson & Wilson v. City CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Dever v. DeVitoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Defreestville Area Neighborhood Ass'n v. Planning BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- People v. ShimAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- Pyramid Co. v. Planning BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.