Legal Opinion
Dreikausen v. Zoning Board of Appeals
New York Court of Appeals
Decided June 6, 2002PublishedCited by 101 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Chief Judge Kaye.
As this zoning dispute has made its way through the courts to us, the question has become one of mootness. We now dismiss the appeal as moot.
The case centers on a 56,000 square foot commercially zoned waterfront property located on Reynolds Channel in Long Beach. 1 The site was used as a marina, which after decades of financial difficulty, in 1991 ultimately went into bankruptcy. The property, located in an otherwise residentially zoned neighborhood, is bounded by single- and two-family homes, a youth center, and a veterinarian and pet center (the only…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Parkview Associates v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- Village Board v. JarroldNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Ellington Construction Corp. v. Zoning Board of Appeals of Inc. Village of New HempsteadNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- Sheerin v. New York Fire Department Articles 1 & 1B Pension FundsNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Friends of Pine Bush v. Planning BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by101 opinions
- Saratoga County Chamber of Commerce, Inc. v. PatakiNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
- Citineighbors Coalition of Historic Carnegie Hill v. New York City Landmarks Preservation CommissionNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
- Dever v. DeVitoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Defreestville Area Neighborhood Ass'n v. Planning BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- People v. ShimAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
96 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.