Bourassa v. Gateway Erectors, Inc.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHallows, C. J.
Two issues are raised on this appeal: (1) Was Bourassa’s negligence at least equal to Gateway’s as a matter of law and should recovery under the comparative negligence law therefore he denied; and (2) were six rulings made by the trial court erroneous and so prejudicial as to require a new trial in the interest of justice?
Contributory negligence.
The apportionment of negligence by a jury, like any other answer in the verdict will be sustained by this court if there is any credible evidence which under any reasonable view supports the jury’s findings. Fisher v. Simon (1961), 15 Wis. 2d 207, 112…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Powers v. Allstate InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
- Netzel v. State Sand & Gravel Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
- Ballard v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- Diemel v. WeirichWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
- Young v. Anaconda American Brass Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Precopio v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
- Peair v. Home Ass'n of Enola Legion No. 751Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Rosh v. Cave Imaging Systems, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1994
- Sampson v. LaskinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
- Bohlman v. American Family Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.