Legal Opinion

United States v. Stephen Wilbur, M.D.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided July 3, 1995No. 94-4013PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judge.

In mid-1994, Stephen Wilbur, a physician, was indicted on one count of acquiring morphine “by misrepresentation, fraud, ... deception, or subterfuge.” See 21 U.S.C. § 843(a)(3). About four months later, a jury convicted him of that charge. He appeals, arguing that the evidence was insufficient to sustain his conviction. We agree; we therefore reverse the conviction and remand for the entry of a judgment of acquittal.

I

To sustain a conviction under 21 U.S.C. § 843(a)(3), there must be evidence that “the defendant acquired ... the drugs in question by…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. Bruce Lusk Bass, IIICourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  2. United States v. Philip William PaceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
  3. United States v. Charles M. HillCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1979
  4. State v. LivingstonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
  5. State v. St. JohnSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. Jordie CallahanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
  2. United States v. CallahanDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2014
  3. United States v. Frank Purpera, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2021
  4. United States v. Helen DuffyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
  5. United States v. Stephen Wilbur, M.D.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API