Legal Opinion
United States v. Charles M. Hill
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided February 2, 1979No. 78-1246PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEPHENSON, Circuit Judge.
Appellant-defendant Charles M. Hill was found guilty by a jury of 32 of 34 counts in an indictment 1 — 16 of 17 counts of illegal acquisition by fraudulent means of a diet pill known as Phendimetrazine, 2 and 16 of 17 counts of possession with intent to distribute Phendimetrazine. 3
Hill appeals from his conviction alleging various errors by the district court. 4 We have carefully reviewed the record and the law in regard to each of Hill’s claims and we find no prejudicial error by the district court. The convictions are affirmed.
The factual basis for each of the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Papachristou v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. Kenneth O. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
- United States v. Donald J. QuinnCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- United States v. LewisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Marvin Leo BeasleyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- United States v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Glennon E. Engleman, United States of America v. Robert Handy, United States of America v. Glennon E. EnglemanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
- United States v. Deral Gene Holman, Donald Bruce Holman, John Mallory ObertCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.