Norton v. Sinkhorn
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On appeal from an order advised by Vice-Chancellor Grey striking out part of the defendants’ answer and dismissing cross-bill.' See opinion reported in 16 Dick. Ch. Rep. SOS.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Depue, Ci-iief-Justice.
The-facts of this case are so fully set out in the opinion of Vice-Chancellor Grey that a brief statement is all that will be necessary here. Briefly, the case is this: The defendants, Sink-horn & Company, entered into a contract with the board of chosen freeholders of the county of Mercer on the 24th of March, 1900, for the grading and macadamizing of a public road in the county of Mercer. The firm entered upon the performance of the contract and completed it on or about the 27th of October, 1900. The bill charges that, under…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Delafield Construction Co. v. SayreSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1897
3Cited by5 opinions
- Curtiss-Warner Corp. v. ThirkettleNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1926
- MECHANICAL DEVICES CO., INC. v. General Builders, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
- Benton Holden v. Central R.R. Co. of N.J.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1937
- Commonwealth Quarry Co. v. GoughertyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1930
- Waterworks Equipment Co. v. McGovernNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1924