Legal Opinion

Union Lumber Co. v. Miller

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 18, 2014No. 100746539; A152241PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSercombe, J.

Defendants appeal an order denying their motion to set aside a judgment in favor of plaintiff. The judgment, which awarded plaintiff damages, was entered following an arbitration that was conducted without defendants’ participation. Among other things, defendants assert that their absence from the arbitration and the consequential judgment in plaintiffs favor occurred as a result of mistake, surprise, or excusable neglect, as well as the misconduct of plaintiffs attorney. Accordingly, defendants assert the trial court erred in not setting aside the judgment under ORCP 71 B.1 Because we agree…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. National Mortgage Co. v. Robert C. Wyatt, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  2. Blue Horse v. Sisters of ProvidenceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  3. Marguerite E. Wright Trust v. Dept. of Rev.Oregon Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State v. PalmerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  5. Bennett v. Board of OptometryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Union Lumber Co. v. Miller​​​​​Oregon Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Hoddenpyl v. FiskumCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  3. Union Lumber Co. v. Miller​​​​​Oregon Supreme Court · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API