Legal Opinion
IN RE D.R.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided July 31, 2014No. 11-FS-1320PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FISHER, Associate Judge:
Appellant D.R., a juvenile, was found to be involved in four criminal offenses related to his possession and brandishing of a large knife or machete. On appeal, he claims that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel and that there was insufficient evidence to support three of the adjudications against him.
Following oral argument, we remanded the record to the trial court for findings on the ineffective assistance claim. 1 After considering the trial record, Judge Broder-ick found that D.R.’s trial counsel was ineffective and informed us that she would be…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Curry v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- Smith v. PollinCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952
- Grayson v. AT & T CORP.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- FURL J. WILLIAMS, ARTHUR TERENCE BULLOCK, and MARTEESE NORMAN v. UNITED STATESDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
- JESUS A. HERNANDEZ v. UNITED STATESDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016
- George S. Thanos v. District of Columbia and District of Columbia v. George S. ThanosDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
- FURL J. WILLIAMS, ARTHUR TERENCE BULLOCK, and MARTEESE NORMAN v. UNITED STATESDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
- JESUS A. HERNANDEZ v. UNITED STATESDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016