Johnson v. Alexander
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hearn
In this attorney malpractice case, Amber Johnson alleges her closing attorney, Stanley Alexander, breached his duty of care by failing to discover the house Johnson purchased had been sold at a tax sale the previous year. The trial court granted partial summary judgment in favor of Johnson as to Alexander’s liability. On appeal, the court of appeals held Alexander could not be held liable as a matter of law simply because the attorney he hired to perform the title work may have been negligent. Instead, the court determined the relevant inquiry was “whether Alexander acted with reasonable care…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Holy Loch Distributors, Inc. v. HitchcockSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
- Turner v. MillimanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
- Elrod v. AllSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1964
- Stevens & Wilkinson of South Carolina, Inc. v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2014
- Harris Teeter, Inc. v. Moore & Van Allen, PLLCSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Curry v. Carolina Insurance Group of SCCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2019
- Danko v. DankoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2020
- The Kitchen Planners v. FriedmanCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2020
- The Kitchen Planners v. FriedmanCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2020