Harris Teeter, Inc. v. Moore & Van Allen, PLLC
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kittredge
This is a legal malpractice action in which the trial court granted summary judgment to the law firm of Moore & Van Allen, PLLC and attorney W. Howell Morrison (Respondents). We certified the appeal of Harris Teeter, Inc. pursuant to Rule 204(b), SCACR. We affirm.
I
STANDARD OF REVIEW
Summary judgment is appropriate when there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. See Rule 56(c), SCRCP; see also Hancock v. Mid-South Mgmt. Co., Inc., 381 S.C. 326, 330, 673 S.E.2d 801, 803 (2009) (“[I]n cases applying the preponderance of the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Kiriakides v. United Artists Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
- Hancock v. Mid-South Management Co., Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2009
- Woodruff v. TomlinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980
- David v. McLeod Regional Medical CenterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
- Oliver v. South Carolina Department of Highways & Public TransportationSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Stokes-Craven Holding Corp. v. RobinsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2016
- Gibson v. EptingCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2019
- Jones v. LattimerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- McClurg v. DeatonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
- Tuten v. JoelCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2014
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.