Legal Opinion

Harris Teeter, Inc. v. Moore & Van Allen, PLLC

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided November 1, 2010No. 26887PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kittredge

This is a legal malpractice action in which the trial court granted summary judgment to the law firm of Moore & Van Allen, PLLC and attorney W. Howell Morrison (Respondents). We certified the appeal of Harris Teeter, Inc. pursuant to Rule 204(b), SCACR. We affirm.

I

STANDARD OF REVIEW

Summary judgment is appropriate when there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. See Rule 56(c), SCRCP; see also Hancock v. Mid-South Mgmt. Co., Inc., 381 S.C. 326, 330, 673 S.E.2d 801, 803 (2009) (“[I]n cases applying the preponderance of the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Kiriakides v. United Artists Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
  2. Hancock v. Mid-South Management Co., Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2009
  3. Woodruff v. TomlinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980
  4. David v. McLeod Regional Medical CenterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
  5. Oliver v. South Carolina Department of Highways & Public TransportationSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Stokes-Craven Holding Corp. v. RobinsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2016
  2. Gibson v. EptingCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2019
  3. Jones v. LattimerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
  4. McClurg v. DeatonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
  5. Tuten v. JoelCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2014

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API