Legal Opinion

United States v. Richter

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided May 25, 1993No. ACMR 9200709PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

DE GIULIO, Senior Judge:

Appellant was tried by a military judge sitting as a special court-martial. Pursuant to his pleas, he was found guilty of obtaining telephone services by false pretenses and breaking restriction in violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 934 (1982). He was sentenced to a bad-conduct discharge and confinement for four months. The sentence was within the limitations of a pretrial agreement, and the convening authority approved it.

Appellant asserts that a new post-trial recommendation is required because no…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. BanksUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979
  2. United States v. IversonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1978
  3. United States v. EasonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1972
  4. United States v. DunbarUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990
  5. United States v. HendonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. GarmanArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2003
  2. United States v. SpriggsArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 1998
  3. United States v. TysonNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API