United States v. Richter
U.S. Army Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
DE GIULIO, Senior Judge:
Appellant was tried by a military judge sitting as a special court-martial. Pursuant to his pleas, he was found guilty of obtaining telephone services by false pretenses and breaking restriction in violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 934 (1982). He was sentenced to a bad-conduct discharge and confinement for four months. The sentence was within the limitations of a pretrial agreement, and the convening authority approved it.
Appellant asserts that a new post-trial recommendation is required because no…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. BanksUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979
- United States v. IversonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1978
- United States v. EasonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1972
- United States v. DunbarUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990
- United States v. HendonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. GarmanArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2003
- United States v. SpriggsArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 1998
- United States v. TysonNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 1996