Legal Opinion

Meyer v. Burger King Corp.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 12, 2001No. 70015-0PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

26 P.3d 925 (2001)

144 Wash.2d 160

Patricia MEYER, minor, by and through her Guardian ad Litem, Gary Meyer; Gary Meyer and Verona Meyer, the natural parents of Patricia Meyer, individually and on behalf of the marital community, Respondents,

v.

BURGER KING CORPORATION, a foreign corporation; the Pillsbury Company, a foreign corporation; Diageo Corporation, a foreign corporation; Grand Metropolitan, a foreign corporation; Sonrise Management, Inc., a domestic corporation; Sisters of Providence in Washington d/b/a Providence St. Peter Hospital; Providence Emergency Physicians; John Doe Nos. One…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement v. Johnson Controls, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Harbeson v. Parke-Davis, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Bishop v. MicheWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Bishop v. MicheWashington Supreme Court · 1999

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Broughton Lumber Co. v. BNSF Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Minton v. Ralston Purina Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Minton v. Ralston Purina Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Schuchman v. HoehnCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
  5. Garibay v. StateCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API