Legal Opinion

Schuchman v. Hoehn

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided November 6, 2003No. 21060-0-IIIPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchultheis, J.

The Industrial Insurance Act immunizes employers from civil liability for most workplace injuries. RCW 51.04.010; Meyer v. Burger King Corp., 144 Wn.2d 160, 164, 26 P.3d 925 (2001). One exception created by statute allows a worker to sue for excess damages if the injury was caused by “the deliberate intention of his or her employer to produce such injury.” RCW 51.24.020. Fourteen-year-old Mallory Webley was seriously injured while bagging ice at Okanogan Ice Company. The Department of Labor and Industries (L&I) determined that Mallory was an employee covered under the Act. Her mother, Deborah…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Folsom v. Burger KingWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Folsom v. Burger KingWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Wilson Court v. Tony Maroni'sWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  5. State v. SchaafWashington Supreme Court · 1987

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Vallandigham v. Clover Park School District No. 400Washington Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Vallandigham v. CLOVER PARK SCHOOL DIST.Washington Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Shellenbarger v. Longview Fibre Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2004
  4. French v. Uribe, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2006
  5. Valencia v. Reardan-Edwall Sch. Dist. No. 1Court of Appeals of Washington · 2005

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API