Legal Opinion

Schmidt v. Chapman

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1964PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkie, J.

Four issues are presented on this appeal:(1) Was the failure of plaintiffs to take such steps as were available to them to protect the building a cause of the building collapse as a matter of law ?(2) Is defendant general contractor liable to plaintiffs for damages resulting from its negligent trespass on the *19land of an intervening landowner whose property adjoined the property on which plaintiffs’ building was located ?(3) Did the trial court err in receiving the opinion evidence of Mr. Mann regarding removal of the intervening strip as a cause of the collapse ?(4) Did the trial court abuse…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Laycock v. ParkerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Henthorn v. M. G. C. Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Anderson v. EggertWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Kreyer v. FARMERS'CO-OPERATIVE LUMBER CO.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Hickman v. WellauerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1919

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Cramer v. Theda Clark Memorial HospitalWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  2. State v. JohnsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Grady v. FelkerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1971
  4. City of La Crosse v. Jiracek Cos., Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1982
  5. Cifre v. Daas Enterprises, Inc.Superior Court of The Virgin Islands · 2015

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API