Russell v. . Fulton
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.
The regularity of the assessment, sale for taxes, foreclosure of tax sale certificate, and purchase by plaintiff are all admitted. Orange County v. Jenkins, 200 N. C., 202, 156 S. E., 774. It is the contention of tbe defendants “that they have certain rights under tbe law as it existed in 1935, wbicb tbey may exercise at their option.” Whatever rights the defendants may have, if any, are not asserted in this action. They suggest on brief that, if so advised, they may yet redeem under C. S., 8038. As to this, the case of Hines v. Williams, 198 N. C., 420, 152 S. E., 39, would seem to be an…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Price v. SlagleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Orange County v. . WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
- Price v. . SlagleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Orange County v. . JenkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- Hines v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Margie McRae v. Don HoganCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012