Legal Opinion
Orange County v. . Jenkins
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided January 27, 1931PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.
Tbe judgment recites an admission by all tbe parties that tbe sale of tbe land in controversy was conducted in compliance with law and that everything was done which the statutes require in order to convey to the purchaser an indefeasible title. The only question for decision is whether the statutes under which the sale was conducted are in conflict with the State or Federal Constitution. This question the trial court resolved against the appellant.
It is contended that these statutes violate Article I, sec. 17, of the Constitution of North Carolina, and Article XIY, sec. 1, of the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Heidritter v. Elizabeth Oil-Cloth Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Leigh v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Bernhardt v. BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
- Armstrong v. . KinsellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Eason v. SpenceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- State v. BlevinsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1948
- Town of Saluda v. County of PolkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
- Orange County v. . WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
- Travis v. JohnstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.