Legal Opinion

Cook v. Dade

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 1916No. Docket No. 2PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to Van Burén; Des Voignes, J. Assumpsit in justice’s court by Richard F. Cook against William Dade for services rendered. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appealed to the circuit court. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtSteere, J.

Plaintiff recovered, in the circuit court of Van Burén county, a verdict and judgment of $70 for feeding, caring for, and breaking'a pair of western horses, or ponies, intrusted to him for that purpose. *562The action was commenced in justice’s court, where the pleadings were oral; plaintiff declaring in assumpsit on the common counts, and defendant pleading the general issue. Plaintiff also furnished a bill of particulars totaling $115.80. Two charges were for feed and care of the horses for 11 weeks at $2.50 per week each, amounting to $55, and for breaking them $10 each, amounting to $20.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Nugent v. TeachoutMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Pierson v. SpauldingMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Phippen v. MorehouseMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Applebaum v. GoldmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Bradley v. LevyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1856

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Janiszewski v. BehrmannMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Gilmer v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Vanderhoef v. Parker Bros. Co., Ltd.Michigan Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Janiszewski v. BehrmannMichigan Supreme Court · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API