In re I.S.

[¶ 1] The father of I.S. appeals from a judgment entered by the District Court (Skowhegan, Fowle, J.) terminating his parental rights pursuant to 22 M.R.S. § 4055 (2014). The father contends that the court violated his equal protection or due process rights by allegedly (1) improperly terminating his parental rights on the basis of his borderline personality disorder diagnosis, (2) placing a burden of proof upon him, and/or (3) failing to provide him with a reasonable period of time for reunification. 1 After careful review of the record, we affirm.

I. CASE HISTORY AND COURT FINDINGS

[¶ 2] The…