Legal Opinion

Bennett v. Heidinger

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 31, 1986No. 50335PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAnn McManamon, J.

James E. Bennett, the plaintiff below, timely appeals from a decision of the Parma Municipal Court which denied Bennett’s entitlement to polygraph test charts (polygrams) prepared by defendant Robert F. Heidinger at Bennett’s request.

Bennett’s sole assignment of error posits that the court’s finding is against the manifest weight of the evidence.

On October 22, 1984, Bennett and Heidinger orally agreed that the latter would conduct a polygraph examination of Bennett’s wife, Elby A. Bennett, to test her marital fidelity. Mrs. Bennett consented to the examination, which was held on October 24,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. C. E. Morris Co. v. Foley Construction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Alexander v. Buckeye Pipe Line Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
  3. McBride v. Prudential Ins. Co. of AmericaOhio Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Striegel v. TofanoNew York Supreme Court · 1977

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Affiliated Fm Insurance Company v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
  2. Widok v. Estate of WolfOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
  3. Bruzzese v. Chesapeake Exploration, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2014
  4. Phillips v. May, Unpublished Decision (11-5-2004)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. Pollock v. Trustar Funding, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2019

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API