Legal Opinion

Howard v. Dorr Woolen Co.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided May 5, 1980No. 79-217; No. 79-293; No. 79-296PublishedCited by 115 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBois, J.

This appeal is a consolidation of three separate cases consisting of two interlocutory appeals and an appeal from the granting of a motion to dismiss by DiClerico, J. The principal issue is whether either the widow or the estate of the decedent is entitled to damages, including the value of a group term life insurance policy, for an alleged wrongful discharge by the defendant. We hold that neither is entitled to such damages, and dismiss the appeal.

According to the agreed statement of facts, Franklin C. Baldwin was employed by the defendant Dorr Woolen Company almost continuously from…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Nees v. HocksOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Monge v. Beebe Rubber Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1974
  3. Whirlpool Corp. v. MarshallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

3Cited by115 opinions

  1. Foley v. Interactive Data Corp.California Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Thompson v. St. Regis Paper CompanyWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Wagenseller v. Scottsdale Memorial HospitalArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Smith v. F.W. Morse Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
  5. Adler v. American Standard Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1981

110 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API