Legal Opinion

Birdville Independent School District v. Hurst Associates

District Court, N.D. Texas

Decided October 2, 1992No. 4:89-CV-595-YPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, DISMISSING DEFENDANT HURST’S COUNTERCLAIM, AND RENDERING ALL OTHER PENDING MOTIONS MOOT

MEANS, District Judge.

Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, which was filed in the • above-styled and numbered cause on November 8, 1991. Related to this motion is Plaintiff’s December 10, 1991 motion to strike the response of defendant Hurst Associates (“Hurst”) to Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment. After careful consideration of these motions, the Court finds that Plaintiff’s motion for…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. BrosnanSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Texas Commerce Bank-Fort Worth, N.A., Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. United States of America, Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
  3. Irving Independent School District v. Packard Properties, Ltd.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1991
  4. Carrollton-Farmers Branch Independent School District v. Federal Deposit InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1991
  5. Durham v. ScrivenerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Simon v. CebrickCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  2. Matagorda County v. Russell LawCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  3. Simon v. CebrickCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
  4. Resolution Trust Corp. v. Tarrant County Appraisal DistrictCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1996
  5. Nueces County v. Whitley Trucks, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API